College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

More than 1,300 sign cat-use petition

By Jett Thompson

Staff Writer

|

Published: Friday, November 13, 2009

Updated: Friday, November 13, 2009

The People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals announced Wednesday it have gathered more than 1,300 signatures on a petition protesting the use of cats in educational procedures at the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center.

Ian Smith, a research associate for PETA, said the majority of the signatures on the petition are from Tech students and the purpose of the petition is to allow the voice of students who oppose the use of cats in training procedures to be heard by HSC administrators.

Smith said the group has led the campaign against the TTUHSC for several months and hopes the petition can be filed by the end of the month.

The controversy surrounding the use of cats in training exercises in the HSC stems from two procedures: intubation and needle decompression, he said. Intubation is the insertion of a breathing apparatus into the windpipe, and needle decompression is a procedure that allows excess pressure from the lungs to be released.

Smith said PETA is against those types of procedures because of the cruelty and trauma it causes to the animals involved. The American Heart Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics changed their policies by endorsing the use of simulators in place of animals for these types of procedures.

The HSC generally obtains its cats in October from the Odessa Animal Control, he said.

This year no orders for cats have been processed yet, he said, which could be part of a gradual effort by the HSC to phase out the use of animal control cats.

Controversy on the subject of animal testing at the HSC has been present during the past several months.

A protest on the use of cats for medical training was organized by PETA on the corner of 19th Avenue and University Avenue in May. Oscar-nominated actor Woody Harrelson sent a letter on behalf of PETA to then-HSC President John Baldwin in July asking the university to stop the use of cats in these training exercises.

After a subsequent investigation in August by U.S. Department of Agriculture authorities, the USDA said the HSC is within legal boundaries in its use of cats in training procedures

Robyn Katz, founder of the Tech Student Animal Legal Defense Fund, said her group has been working with PETA to raise awareness on campus and to get student signatures on the petition that will be sent to the HSC.

“In our effort toward tier one, there is no reason for Tech to be behind the times and use animals,” said Katz. “Schools like Harvard and Yale have been using human simulators for years.”

Mary Croyle, director of communications and marketing at the HSC, said in an e-mail to The Daily Toreador she was not aware of the petition.

Spokesperson from the university were not available for comment on the issue of using cats for training in educational procedures, but released a statement about the issue in August.

“General anesthesia is administered to the cats which renders them free of pain and distress during the procedure, and they are closely attended until given humane euthanasia,” according to the statement.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

26 comments

North TX MD
Sat Nov 21 2009 13:06
As a physician who has never trained on animals, I can attest that these "cat labs" are not only unnecessary, but can be detrimental to humans. Those who learn procedures like intubation on anything less than humans or human models are learning incorrectly because they learn to adapt to non-human anatomy. The airway of a cat, dog, ferret, etc. is very different than that of a human. The top schools in the nation have cancelled live animal labs. If Tech wants to join the 21st century, it needs to open it's eyes and base it's medical procedure labs on people.
Further - any educated person realizes that in the long run, human simulators are far more economical than the annual purchase and processing of live animals. Of more importance however, it is much MUCH better training for America's future doctors.
Your name
Wed Nov 18 2009 13:31
Well for those of you who think this is a problem, just remember that the cost of using life like maniquens will increase our tuition, because now after the inital purchase, they will have to spend money on maintaining these tools. The cats are a big problem in the way of over population; the students who buy the cats and can't afford to keep them are to blame and also those who don't get their cats fixed...We use the cats in order to teach our students and most will be put down, so stop crying over spilled milk.
Drew
Wed Nov 18 2009 10:56
BS. If you're crying over a bunch of cats used to train future physicians, then you don't have big enough problems. Plus, bunches of them will be euthanized anyway, so who cares? Only on a college campus.
Louise
Wed Nov 18 2009 08:22
To Dan (commented November 16 18h28) take a visit to India - leprosy is alive and well there. Animal testing will never replace human stupidity, and that I am afraid is incurable.
Jewel
Tue Nov 17 2009 16:31
Come on people. Regardless of if you hate PETA or ALF or whatever, use her noggins. The University needs to get with the times and the use of lifelike manoquins is much more realistic than torturing a creature whether it be a cat, dog, or monkey. Give me a break. You are always going to have a nutcase somewhere in the crowd, no matter how good the intentions are. Some people thrive on inflicting pain to others and to animals. give me a break
Natasha
Tue Nov 17 2009 15:37
This animal cruelty must end. Thank you PETA for having compassion unlike most so called 'human beings'.
Real human beings are kind to every livig being that have feelings.
Dan
Mon Nov 16 2009 18:28
I saw the most amazing billboard recently in the DFW area. I feel compelled and obligated to share! The billboard reads, "Ever had Leprosy? Probably not, thanks to Animal Testing!"
Charles TTU
Sun Nov 15 2009 19:35
Hey TTU Grad Student below--

TTUHSC already has the hi-tech simulators they need to replace cats and are using them to teach the very same skills at the F. Marie Hall Sim Center. This makes it even more egregious that they continue to harm animals for the training at all in this other course on campus.

Dick
Sun Nov 15 2009 17:43
I live in Chicago and PETA-supported ALF is just as much a terrorist organization here as it is in west Texas. There are world-class medical centers here and PETA does not like them anymore than it likes Texas Tech.
TTU Grad Student eager to get to a REAL med school
Sat Nov 14 2009 23:59
First of all, let's be real here. TTUHSC is a mediocre, Tier 3 health science center. There is no way in hell that Texas Tech (any of its schools) will ever reach Tier 1 unless it gets with the times. This includes the following: getting away from its status quo of abusing animals, concentrating on bettering the medical field instead of sticking to the redneck ways of West Texas, and opening up their minds. Oh wait? We are in West Texas, where people think it is okay to abuse animals, tie them up, and treat them like the scum of the earth. Well, you know what? If you go to a doctor, I would strongly suggest you make sure that he/she does not come from TTUHSC, because remember--they practice on cats. If it were me, I'd rather them do their practice on something that looks just like me, rather than a 4-legged creature. And also--TTUHSC claims that the cats are anesthetized before they are intubated. This is a blatant lie. In order to properly intubate, there must be a gag reflex. So--either they are intubating without a gag reflex (and shoot, if you find someone without a gag reflex, please let me know), or lying to us. You decide. But you ignoramus people who are so against PETA need to get out of West Texas and look to top tier schools and see how they do things. Or we will continue to lurk in the shadows of Baylor, UT-Medical Branch, and the like.
r maca
Sat Nov 14 2009 09:42
Animals deserve to be respected and protected.
Stop the animal torture!
nemo
Sat Nov 14 2009 02:03
HSC does use mannequins to teach these procedures. Only a small number of cats are used for more specialized instruction than can be provided on mannequins. PETA is deliberately misleading the public to gain sympathy for its cause.
Your name
Sat Nov 14 2009 00:17
They do have a painless death. If they didn't have a painless death then they wouldn't be allowed to continue the practice.
Stacy
Fri Nov 13 2009 23:33
One doesn't need to be supportive of everything PETA or any other animal welfare organization does to realize that torturing cats who have already been abused or abandoned by people is just wrong. Imagine if your cat got out and was picked up, or you had to surrender it to the shelter for some reason...wouldn't you expect it to have some sort of painless, dignified death? I think most people with an ounce of compassion can see that this is horrible and needs to stop.
Diane Rutherford
Fri Nov 13 2009 17:41
SHOCKING - that in 21st century this barberic practice is stil considered good science!!!i
Your name
Fri Nov 13 2009 17:20
Who cares if Tech is using animals for medical practices? The Odessa Animal Control rounded these cats up and were going to euthanise them anyway. At least they can be used in a beneficial way before being euthanised. It is a cat. How does this animal being killed affect your life? It doesn't, as a matter of fact it benefits you. If it wasn't beneficial for Tech to use cats then they probably wouldn't, and like I said they were going to be put down anyway, may as well get some use out of them to better us.
TTU Grad Student
Fri Nov 13 2009 17:10
When PETA is ready to put their money where their mouths are and buy all the human simulators and equipment and donate them to TTUHSC, we'll talk.

Or here's another idea: why don't we train the students to intubate PETA members? I think we can all agree that doing so is (a) humane to cats and (b) more like a real-world hospital intubation procedure.

What? No takers, PETA? Then shut up or donate the human simulators.

Your name
Fri Nov 13 2009 16:17
Diana, I think publicly identifying me as a user of PETA's Action Alert website is a violation of the privacy policy that I read and agreed to: "PETA is extremely protective of the information gathered through its membership and Web site. Our Web site has security measures in place to protect against the loss, misuse, or alteration of the information under our control. Our Web server is located in a locked, secure environment." But thanks for providing a convenient way (www.peta.org/texastech) for people to let multiple Tech administrators know that they support the right of the faculty to determine their own teaching methods without interference from extremist groups.
Diana
Fri Nov 13 2009 15:35
Who cares what you think about PETA? The point is that Texas Tech is engaged in animal abuse and they aren't doing it to look for cures to terrible ills or to develop new drugs or anything like that...they are using cats to teach medical procedures that almost every other facility in the country uses mannequins to teach.

Note, it isn't just groups like PETA that suggest that mannequins rather than cats should be used...the American Heart Assocation and the American Academy of Pediatrics also recommend mannequins because they actually resemble human patients and provide a better learning experience.

If you don't like PETA and don't want to be associated with them, then do not contact Tech administrators via the PETA web form...send your own email, in your own words.

Dick
Fri Nov 13 2009 14:33
Amy, PETA speaks for ALF. ALF membership is secret but probably overlaps with PETA members as you can infer from PETA's statement on it's relationship to and approval of ALF. The only reason that ALF hasn't killed anyone while doing tens of millions of dollars damage is sheer luck and perhaps incompetence. In the most notorious case, terrorists tried to firebomb the home of a UCLA professor. They mistakenly placed the bomb on a neighbor's porch. The fuse timer failed, but the FBI said the blast might well have killed those inside. By definition and in practice, acts of terrorism have the objective of making people, especially targeted researchers, feel terrified. ALF wants to stop animal research by frightening scientists. That is terrorism. I do not use the term lightly. It is Homeland Secuity and the FBI that have both identified ALF as a terrorist organization and called it the most dangerous domestic terrorist group. All this is not to mention the countless careers and lives that have been ruined by PETA/ALF attacks. If you could meet these victims as I have and see what terrorism has done to them, you wouldn't be able to say that no human beings have been injured. Not only that, but in the case of the Texas Tech attack, animals were the victims. How crazy is that? Finally, there are some credible scientists who have ethical objections to some kinds of animal research. I can respect that. But no credible scientists deny the value of animal research or claim that it does not inform understanding of other species and none of them advocate terrorism as a means to a more ethical world.






log out