College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Proposition 4 passed with about 55 percent in favor

By Jon Vanderlaan

Edmund Rostran

|

Published: Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, November 4, 2009

prop four vote

Ken Muir

The Robert H. Ewalt Student Recreation Center hosted a polling station for Election Day on Tuesday for registered voters from Lubbock to come and cast their ballot on city and state propositions.

Texas Tech and six other emerging research universities in Texas are one step closer to achieving the goal of tier-one status after voters approved Proposition 4 on Nov. 3 with 56.6 percent of the vote in favor and 98.5 percent of precincts reported as of press time.

The proposition creates the National Research University Fund, or NRUF, and re-appropriates $500 million from the Higher Education Fund to the NRUF. The universities that will be able to draw from the fund are Tech, the University of Texas-Arlington, UT-Dallas, UT-El Paso, UT-San Antonio, the University of North Texas and the University of Houston.

The fund was made possible by House Bill 51, which passed during the 2009 Texas Legislative Session. The bill created criteria for required universities to draw from the fund and created various incentives to help the universities reach the goals.

Rep. Dan Branch, R-Dallas, said the fund will perpetuate similarly to an endowment fund, raising money with the interest earned from the fund. Because of this, the state will not need to raise taxes to keep money in the fund.

“It’s a huge affirmation by Texans of our legislative agenda to create more tier-one universities,” said Branch, one of the co-authors of House Bill 51 and chairman of the House Higher Education Committee.

Sandra Torres, a resident of Lubbock who voted for Proposition 4 on Tuesday, said she thinks the proposition is important for the university in terms of research and attracting better faculty and students.

“More research is better, not less,” Torres said. “So whatever would attract better-quality faculty and would give the university more grant money to do more research and draw more attention to the area, that would be fantastic.”

Tech Chancellor Kent Hance said the university will continue to secure funding and to fill five of the seven requirements to draw from the fund.

“Texas Tech is a tier-one university when it comes to teaching,” he said. “What we’re working on is tier-one as far as research is concerned.”

Hance said the vote is probably the most important statewide election the university has been part of and one of the most important days in the history of Tech.

Kendre Parker, a senior psychology major from Fort Worth, said she voted for the proposition because she wants Tech to become one of the few tier-one schools in Texas.
“I definitely see degrees becoming more promising,” Parker said. “They are definitely going to mean a lot more when you go to apply for a job, and I also think that we are going to make a lot of advances within the university.”

The next step in the process for the universities, Branch said, is to draw from upcoming incentives provided by HB 51, including a $126 million fund to benefit universities that draw more research and a $80 million fund to benefit universities for improving graduation rates.

Within the next year, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board will meet to discuss the subjective criteria laid out in the bill, Branch said, and will confer with the legislature to make sure the rules to allow universities to draw from the fund are clear.

If the rules are not consistent and the board finds problems with them, he said, they can make changes to correct misunderstandings and any lack of clarity.

“It’s time for us to step up and meet our competition because we’re not doing well in terms of national research universities,” Branch said.

The process will take time, he said, but he feels the rules will be in place by the time any universities are nearing the benchmarks set by the bill.

Sen. Robert Duncan, R-Lubbock, said the concept was widely accepted by the legislature from the beginning, and the higher education community was a huge supporter of it.

“We want those (seven) universities to be on an even par with universities around the nation,” he said.

Despite a need to grow from the $500 million in the fund to support all seven universities, Duncan said, the state will find other sources of revenue rather than increase taxes for Texas residents.

Because the fund is an endowment, he said, only the return from the fund will be used, not the principal.

“I’m very satisfied and very pleased for the future of higher education in Texas,” he said.

Each of the 11 constitutional amendments listed were passing Tuesday as of press time.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

16 comments

Jessica
Mon Nov 16 2009 10:49
Does Houston High not have a blog or a newspaper of their own? Why are they venting on our newspapers?
Your name
Fri Nov 13 2009 14:35
you are all gay. get a life
Stephen Worthy
Mon Nov 9 2009 20:55
Sorry but even according to The Texas Tech Website the "University of Houston" is beating us on all fronts. Take a look I to did not believe it but then I saw this: go to www . today . ttu . edu / 2009 / 06 / tier - one - legislation/
(sorry that its all spaced but otherwise it wouldn't do it.)

We are however second, people seem to think because that University is in Houston its a bad university, I have a couple of friends their and have been their myself and it is a really nice place.

Wreck 'Em Tech!

Matt
Mon Nov 9 2009 13:42
@ Bob Smith:
They are clearly not the frontrunners because they do still need to gain 100 million in research money as well as a Phi Beta Kappa Chapter. Of all the schools who are competing to become teir 1, only Tech has the majority of the requirements necessary.
Shamoo4Leisure
Thu Nov 5 2009 17:16
you think we could get an amusement park right next to the water park with this money? It would be the West Texas 6 flags .... we know the money isn't going to be spent on fixing parking problems, new books/computers, outdated dorms, poor air quality, or the recruitment of teaching PROFESSIONALS (unlike Mr. Gonzales)
Brian
Thu Nov 5 2009 14:12
..ah, apparently this system doesn't like URLs at all, but here's my post as a whole:

Russell360:

Again, you're spreading misinformation. The University of Houston doesn't have a Phi Beta Kappa chapter, but this is not the single requirement as outlined. The requirement is that the university have a Phi Beta Kappa chapter, OR hold membership in the Association of Research Libraries. Each hold the same bearing regarding eligibility for funding. Therefore, it makes no difference whether Houston has a Phi Beta Kappa chapter.

As far as having as incoming classes having higher SAT scores, this is one of the most easily remedied situations because, it's simply a matter of the university changing their admission requirements. The University of Houston initiated this process yesterday. Therefore, it's not really an issue here. It's much more difficult to meet the other requirements.

Higher 6-year graduation rates are a function of those higher admission standards. They will rise drastically when those standards are changed. Check out this article to find out more about this: mindingthecampus.com/originals/2009/09/why_are_graduation_rates_so_lo.html

So, yeah, the only thing Tech may have on Houston is that its 6-year graduation rates are a bit higher. However, I also attribute this to many students wanting to get out of Lubbock, and back to urban society. These people end up moving to Houston, Dallas, Austin, etc. after graduating. There's nothing there for them in Lubbock. Also, it's important to point out that this measurement has NOT been specified as an official measure of quantifying quality of classes by the legislature or The Higher Education Coordinating board who will be determining such criteria. It's simply a measure that has been used by other agencies and institutions to determine quality in the past. Therefore, this may not even come into the equation!

You're correct that Texas Tech raised more money in the TRIP program, however that money is only a short-term solution to the issue of research budgets. You see, this merely ups Texas Tech's research budget for two years. After that money's gone, it's not coming back until Tech can reach Tier I status. This is a major issue because Texas Tech needs that money JUST to be in a closer 2nd with the University of Houston's research budget for the time being. For fiscal year 2008, Houston had a research budget of $87 million WITHOUT any TRIP funding. Texas Tech had a budget of only $54 million. Now imagine if the TRIP funding that both Tech and Houston qualified for is added into the equation. Here's what it would look like: Houston-$91.6 million, Texas Tech-$75 million. Then, take into account that this is only a temporary measure of two years. At that point Texas Tech's funding will drop down considerably, while Houston's funding will only drop down by a small percentage. So, who's in better shape here? It's Houston!

The bottom-line is that the University of Houston IS the frontrunner here. That's not to say that Texas Tech isn't in a close second. Both of these universities will be the next Tier I institutions in Texas together.

Brian
Thu Nov 5 2009 14:08
Russell360:

Again, you're spreading misinformation. The University of Houston doesn't have a Phi Beta Kappa chapter, but this is not the single requirement as outlined. The requirement is that the university have a Phi Beta Kappa chapter, OR hold membership in the Association of Research Libraries. Each hold the same bearing regarding eligibility for funding. Therefore, it makes no difference whether Houston has a Phi Beta Kappa chapter.

As far as having as incoming classes having higher SAT scores, this is one of the most easily remedied situations because, it's simply a matter of the university changing their admission requirements. The University of Houston initiated this process yesterday. Therefore, it's not really an issue here. It's much more difficult to meet the other requirements.

Continued in next post...

Your name
Thu Nov 5 2009 14:06
....testing.
Russell360
Thu Nov 5 2009 07:05
UH doesn't have a Phi Beta Kappa chapter and it's SATs and graduation rates are lower than Tech's ,so you can't say that Houston leads in all categories.

Tech will get there. Tech qualified for a much larger share of the T.R.I.P. money than Houston (4X) and will be able to qualify for tier one money.

Brian
Thu Nov 5 2009 04:26
Those claiming Houston isn't the frontrunner, and suggesting facts be checked, do YOU check YOUR facts? The figures are quite clear. It's UH who leads in every category: (1) Research expenditures: UH-$87 mil, TTU-$53 mil (2) Awarded doctorates: UH-262, TTU-221 (3) National academies members: UH-8, TTU-1 (4) Post-doctoral appointees: UH-111, TTU-63 (5) Endowment: UH-$597 mil, TTU-$415 mil. So you see? You're wrong.
James W
Wed Nov 4 2009 21:45
Realist, please keep your factless rebutal to yourself. Come back when you have facts to refute Bob Smith's claim that UH is the tier one frontrunner.
Realist
Wed Nov 4 2009 16:50
Bob Smith keep you Houston love to yourself, fact wise Tech is way ahead (research money wise, quality of educatio wise ...) than any of the 'upcoming' research universities including your beloved Houston.
Bob Smith
Wed Nov 4 2009 12:07
It is Prop 4 and it's funny how the University of Houston is mentioned last when they are the clear front runners, they have met all but one of the criteria which is to gain 100 million in research money annually for two years straight. They actually achieved that this year so all they need to do is keep it up until the next year. At Tech we still need to reach that 100 million mark AND grant over 200 doctoral degrees per year (We did around 160 last year so we are not far off). Clearly The University of Houston and Texas Tech will become the next tier-one universities in that order.
ROBERT WILLIAMS
Wed Nov 4 2009 10:31
It was Prop 4, not Prop 2.
Your mom's name
Wed Nov 4 2009 09:45
Epic editing fail. I guess UT must be poaching all the champion UIL Headline Writing people.
Your name
Wed Nov 4 2009 02:13
Prop 1, ey?






log out